AI Tool Comparison

Humanly vs Gem

An objective side-by-side comparison based on global rankings, AI scores, and monthly user data.

Humanly logo

Humanly

HR & Recruiting

Conversational AI platform for candidate screening and interview scheduling.

AI Score90.9 / 100

#20

Global Rank

–

Monthly Users

Visit HumanlyFull Profile
VS
Higher Ranked
Gem logo

Gem

HR & Recruiting

AI-powered talent acquisition and recruiting CRM platform.

AI Score91.7 / 100

#15

Global Rank

–

Monthly Users

Visit GemFull Profile

Side-by-Side Comparison

HumanlyGem
CategoryHR & RecruitingHR & Recruiting
Global Rank#20#15
AI Score90.9/10091.7/100
Monthly Users––
PricingContact SalesFreemium
Websitehumanly.iogem.com

Pros & Cons

Humanly

  • Purpose-built specifically for high-volume and frontline hiring scenarios
  • 24/7 candidate engagement removes human availability bottlenecks
  • Emerging outcome-based pricing (pay-per-candidate, pay-per-hire) could better align cost with results
  • No published pricing — requires a demo and custom quote
  • Estimated $15,000-$50,000+/year cost may be steep for smaller teams
  • Outcome-based pricing models are still emerging, not yet the standard offering

Gem

  • Free six-month offer for companies under 30 employees makes evaluation genuinely low-risk
  • Combines CRM, ATS, sourcing, and analytics in one integrated platform
  • Startup-tier pricing accommodates smaller companies (1-10 FTE) at lower cost
  • Real median contract value ($24,900/year) is well above the simple per-seat published rates would suggest
  • Most enterprise buyers negotiate custom pricing rather than paying published list rates
  • Actual cost varies significantly by company size, modules, and contract length