AI Tool Comparison
Lex vs ChatGPT
An objective side-by-side comparison based on global rankings, AI scores, and monthly user data.
Higher Ranked

Lex
Writing & ChatAI-native word processor for writers built on GPT models.
AI Score66.5 / 100
#253
Global Rank
–
Monthly Users
VS
Higher Ranked

ChatGPT
Writing & ChatThe world's most popular AI chatbot for writing, coding, research, and everyday tasks.
AI Score97.4 / 100
#3
Global Rank
400M+
Monthly Users
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Lex | ChatGPT | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Writing & Chat | Writing & Chat |
| Global Rank | #253 | #3 |
| AI Score | 66.5/100 | 97.4/100 |
| Monthly Users | – | 400M+ |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Website | lex.page | chat.openai.com |
Pros & Cons
Lex
- Genuinely simple pricing structure (free or one paid tier) compared to complex multi-tier competitors
- Free tier’s 30 AI checks/month with multi-model access is usable for light writing needs
- Pro plan includes a money-back guarantee for risk-free evaluation
- Reported Pro pricing varies across sources ($14.99-$24.99/month) — verify the current rate directly
- Free tier’s 30 AI checks/month may be limiting for heavier writing workflows
- Premium AI models require upgrading to the Pro plan
ChatGPT
- Largest user base and ecosystem of any AI assistant, with the most third-party integrations
- Genuinely broad capability across writing, coding, research, and file analysis
- Custom GPTs allow tailoring the assistant to specific repeated tasks
- Frequent model updates keep it competitive on raw capability
- Free tier has usage limits and access to a lower-tier model than paid plans
- Can produce confident-sounding but incorrect information, especially without browsing enabled
- Breadth can mean less depth than a tool purpose-built for one specific workflow
- Data usage and training policies require attention for sensitive or regulated work