AI Tool Comparison
Sourcegraph Cody vs Amazon CodeGuru
An objective side-by-side comparison based on global rankings, AI scores, and monthly user data.
Higher Ranked

Sourcegraph Cody
CodingAI coding assistant with full codebase context — understands your entire repo for smarter answers.
AI Score24.1 / 100
#612
Global Rank
–
Monthly Users
VS
Higher Ranked

Amazon CodeGuru
CodingAWS service for automated code reviews and application profiling.
AI Score0.0 / 100
#912
Global Rank
–
Monthly Users
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Sourcegraph Cody | Amazon CodeGuru | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Coding | Coding |
| Global Rank | #612 | #912 |
| AI Score | 24.1/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Monthly Users | – | – |
| Pricing | Enterprise | Paid |
| Website | sourcegraph.com | aws.amazon.com |
Pros & Cons
Sourcegraph Cody
- Genuinely deep full-codebase and cross-repo context provides more accurate answers than single-file-context tools
- Actively developed and focused specifically on complex, large-scale enterprise engineering needs
- Sourcegraph Enterprise bundles AI-feature credits, cross-repo context, and model controls together
- Free and Pro tiers were discontinued entirely on July 23, 2025, eliminating access for individual developers
- Enterprise contracts start at $16,000, well outside the budget of indie developers or small teams
- Per-user rate of $59/month on top of the enterprise contract adds further cost at scale
Amazon CodeGuru
- Combines static code review with production application performance profiling
- Trained on patterns from large, real-world codebases
- Integrates well with existing AWS development workflows
- Most naturally suited to teams already using AWS infrastructure
- Usefulness depends on how low-noise and actionable its findings are in practice
- Not a code generation tool — it reviews existing code rather than writing new code