AI Tool Comparison

Remote vs Applied

An objective side-by-side comparison based on global rankings, AI scores, and monthly user data.

Higher ranked
Remote logo

Remote

HR & Recruiting

Global HR, payroll and employer-of-record platform.

AI Score81.6 / 100

#115

Global rank

–

Monthly users

Visit siteProfile
VS
A

Applied

HR & Recruiting

Bias-reducing recruitment platform.

AI Score64.1 / 100

#519

Global rank

–

Monthly users

Visit siteProfile

Side-by-Side Comparison

RemoteApplied
CategoryHR & RecruitingHR & Recruiting
Global Rank#115#519
AI Score81.6/10064.1/100
Monthly Users––
PricingPaidContact Sales
Websiteremote.combeapplied.com

Pros & Cons

Remote

  • Clear published-style tiers
  • Reported to be cash-flow positive
  • Strong funding history
  • EOR price changes cause confusion
  • Statutory costs add 20-40% or more
  • Revenue and funding data are third-party estimates

Applied

  • Evidence-based approach from behavioural science
  • Transparent method, no black-box matching
  • Covers screening, interviews and job ads
  • Pricing not found
  • Less automation than AI screening tools
  • One review reported a minor feature bug