AI Tool Comparison
Turing vs Applied
An objective side-by-side comparison based on global rankings, AI scores, and monthly user data.
Higher ranked
Turing
HR & RecruitingAI-vetted remote developer hiring platform.
AI Score73.2 / 100
#244
Global rank
–
Monthly users
VS
A
Applied
HR & RecruitingBias-reducing recruitment platform.
AI Score64.1 / 100
#519
Global rank
–
Monthly users
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Turing | Applied | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | HR & Recruiting | HR & Recruiting |
| Global Rank | #244 | #519 |
| AI Score | 73.2/100 | 64.1/100 |
| Monthly Users | – | – |
| Pricing | Contact Sales | Contact Sales |
| Website | turing.com | beapplied.com |
Pros & Cons
Turing
- Large claimed talent pool
- Fast matching reported
- Well funded ($2.2B valuation in 2025)
- Pricing comes from competitor sites
- Funding totals differ between sources
- Company focus has shifted partly toward AI training data
Applied
- Evidence-based approach from behavioural science
- Transparent method, no black-box matching
- Covers screening, interviews and job ads
- Pricing not found
- Less automation than AI screening tools
- One review reported a minor feature bug